Is Your State Prepared for a Medical Emergency?

Why you can trust Move.org
movers helped every month
20k
moving grants awarded
24
moving companies evaluated
156
years of expert experience
80+

For over 8 years Move.org experts have examined pricing, credentials, and real customer reviews to give you (human) recommendations you can trust. See how we review.

Alina Bradford
Apr 02, 2025
Icon Time To Read3 min read

With 20+ years in home services and tech, Alina shares insights from her 15+ moves. She writes for CBSNews, MSN, and more while renovating her country house.

A new nationwide study has revealed that South Dakota leads all U.S. states in medical emergency preparedness, beating both urban and coastal regions in critical areas like hospital access and emergency room efficiency.

The research, conducted by Masumi, evaluated all 50 states using key healthcare metrics, including the number of hospitals, available beds, size of the medical workforce, and average emergency response times. The final rankings were determined using data from the American Hospital Directory and the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF), forming a composite score of emergency readiness.

South Dakota: Small state, big results

""

With a perfect preparedness score of 100, South Dakota stands out for having the most hospitals per capita (2.5 per 100,000 residents) and the nation’s shortest average ER wait time—just 113 minutes. The state also ranks highly for its nursing workforce, solidifying its status as the most prepared state in times of medical crisis.

Top contenders: Louisiana and Mississippi

South Dakota is followed closely by Louisiana, which is in second place with a score of 97.9. While the state has slightly fewer hospitals per capita, it boasts one of the highest numbers of available doctors (302.5 per 100K) and a strong supply of hospital beds (299.4 per 100K residents).

Mississippi, ranked third, leads the nation in hospital bed availability, with 304.7 per 100K residents. Despite a smaller medical workforce compared to other top-ranked states, its healthcare infrastructure supports a high emergency readiness score of 95.4.

Other states in the top 10

Image: Move.org

  • West Virginia ranks fourth with 2 hospitals per 100K residents and a strong showing of 328.6 doctors per 100K, along with substantial hospital capacity.

  • Ohio places fifth, offering a solid balance of doctors and facilities, though its hospital count is lower at 1.2 per 100K.

  • Massachusetts comes in sixth, despite having only 1 hospital per 100K residents. The state has the highest doctor density in the nation, with 511.3 doctors per 100K.
  • Missouri takes seventh place with an impressive nursing workforce (1,057.5 nurses per 100K) and 356.6 doctors per 100K.

States least prepared for medical emergencies

Idaho, Washington, and Utah top this unexpected list.

Image: Move.org

We've talked about the best, now let's talk about the rest. Despite being home to several well-known healthcare institutions, many western and coastal states fell short in critical emergency-readiness metrics.

Idaho, Washington, and Utah top the list—not for excelling but for underperforming. Idaho, for instance, earned the lowest composite preparedness score of all states analyzed, largely due to its limited hospital capacity and relatively small medical workforce. Though it has 0.9 hospitals per 100,000 residents, its number of hospital beds (131.7 per 100K) and doctors (186.3 per 100K) remain on the lower end nationally.

States like Arizona, Nevada, and California also appear on the list, despite their large populations and growing demand for healthcare services. Arizona and Nevada provide better-than-average bed availability, but the number of healthcare workers per capita lags behind. While performing slightly better, Maryland, Colorado, and Oregon still struggle with emergency infrastructure or workforce shortfalls.

Texas, rounding out the list, has a high number of hospitals and hospital beds, but falls behind in terms of staffing—particularly in physicians per 100K residents. This imbalance reflects a broader issue found across many of these lower-ranked states: a growing gap between infrastructure and the professionals needed to make it function in a crisis.

The findings underline an important message. Having advanced medical technology or large urban centers doesn’t necessarily equate to emergency readiness. True preparedness depends on a well-balanced system that includes adequate facilities, sufficient medical personnel, and efficient response mechanisms. 

Alina Bradford
Written by
For more than twenty years, Alina has been a meaningful contributor to numerous publications and outlets, including CNET, CBS, Digital Trends, MTV, Top Ten Reviews, Consumer Affairs, SafeWise, and many others. Her hobbies include fixing up her house in the country, doing artsy stuff, and going to the lake with her family.